BITC vs 21BC: A Comprehensive ETF Comparison

·

Introduction

Investing in Bitcoin through Exchange-Traded Products (ETPs) offers a regulated and accessible pathway to cryptocurrency exposure. This comparison analyzes two prominent EU-listed Bitcoin ETPs: CoinShares Physical Bitcoin (BITC) and 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP (21BC), evaluating their structures, costs, and suitability for different investor profiles.


ETF Overviews

BITC - CoinShares Physical Bitcoin

21BC - 21Shares Bitcoin Core ETP


Detailed Comparison

MetricBITC21BC
ProviderCoinShares21Shares
IndexBitcoinBitcoin
Asset ClassCryptocurrencyCryptocurrency
ListingEU-listedEU-listed
Expense Ratio0.35%0.21%
CurrencyUSDUSD
LeverageNon-leveragedNon-leveraged

👉 Explore Bitcoin ETPs for more investment options.


Key Investment Considerations

  1. Cost Efficiency: 21BC’s lower expense ratio (0.21% vs. 0.35%) may appeal to long-term investors.
  2. Track Record: BITC has a longer operational history (2021 vs. 2022).
  3. Structure: BITC uses physical Bitcoin collateral, while 21BC employs a synthetic ETP model.

Performance and Risk Analysis

Note: Backtesting results are hypothetical and require real-time data for accurate metrics.

Hypothetical Metrics (Illustrative)


FAQs

1. Which ETP is better for cost-conscious investors?

Answer: 21BC’s 0.21% expense ratio makes it more cost-effective than BITC (0.35%).

2. How do these ETPs handle Bitcoin storage?

Answer: BITC holds physical Bitcoin, while 21BC uses a custodian-backed structure.

3. Are these ETPs available globally?

Answer: Both are EU-listed but accessible to international investors via brokerage accounts.

👉 Diversify your crypto portfolio with trusted ETPs.


Conclusion

BITC and 21BC offer distinct advantages—BITC with its physical collateral and 21BC with lower fees. Investors should align their choice with cost tolerance and risk appetite. For deeper insights, consult a financial advisor.

Disclaimer: Past performance does not guarantee future results. Cryptocurrency investments carry high volatility risk.