Perspectives on ENS, ORDI, and Other Cryptocurrency Tokens

·

1. Views on DAOs

DAOs (Decentralized Autonomous Organizations) were a sector I was highly optimistic about in the early days—around 2018–2019.

At the time, I was far more bullish on DAOs than DeFi. My reasoning, as I’ve mentioned in previous articles:

The ideal DAO would be a self-sustaining, smart contract-driven system capable of autonomous decision-making and project advancement.

However, years of experimentation have shown that such DAOs are rare or underutilized (e.g., Aragon). Most current DAOs function as token-based voting mechanisms, often dominated by project teams or initial investors (e.g., venture capital firms).

Future Outlook

Despite setbacks, I believe truly autonomous DAOs will emerge, likely led by a globally distributed yet tightly coordinated core team. These DAOs will leverage token incentives and on-chain governance to outperform traditional collaborative platforms like GitHub in transparency and efficiency.


2. Evaluation of ENS

ENS (Ethereum Name Service) is a recurring topic among readers, reflecting its status as an Ethereum OG—but also its stagnation.

Key Observations

👉 Explore more about Ethereum Layer 2 solutions


3. ORDI Team Assessment

ORDI is a token defined by a script, with no ongoing development post-launch.

Critical Points


FAQs

Q: Are DAOs viable replacements for traditional corporations?

A: Not yet—most lack autonomy, but future DAOs may combine global talent with token-driven governance.

Q: Why has ENS underperformed?

A: Slow adoption and innovation delays; competitors are outpacing its Layer 2 integration.

Q: Is ORDI a good long-term investment?

A: Like Bitcoin, its value hinges on community trust, not active development.

👉 Learn how to evaluate crypto investments